The three simultaneous failures outside the window

Gold leaching with cyanide is a straightforward reaction:

4 Au + 8 CN⁻ + O₂ + 2 H₂O → 4 [Au(CN)₂]⁻ + 4 OH⁻

The rate depends on free cyanide activity and dissolved oxygen. Both are pH-controlled. Below pH 9.5, cyanide protonates to HCN — a volatile gas that leaves the tank, taking reagent with it and producing an occupational exposure issue. Above pH 11.5, the elevated alkalinity precipitates calcium as CaCO₃ which fouls the carbon, and competing ferrocyanide complexes form that lock gold into species the carbon cannot load.

Figure 1. Au recovery efficiency as a function of CIL tank pH. The window is narrower than most operators treat it.
Figure 1. Au recovery efficiency as a function of CIL tank pH. The window is narrower than most operators treat it.

Between 10.5 and 11.0, recovery is within 2 % of the theoretical maximum. Outside that band in either direction, recovery falls off — smoothly at first, steeply after ±0.5 pH from the optimum.

Three failures, one symptomYou see 'the mill is running slow.' Actually it may be: (1) HCN escape at low pH reducing available reagent, (2) CaCO₃ fouling on the carbon at high pH, (3) gold complex speciation shifts at the edges. The DCS shows one pH number. The plant experiences three problems.

Free CN⁻ dosing: the 0.05 g/L variance that costs money

Figure 2. Gold recovery vs free CN⁻ in CIL. The band is narrow and the ISE can miss it.
Figure 2. Gold recovery vs free CN⁻ in CIL. The band is narrow and the ISE can miss it.

Free cyanide is usually measured by ISE (cyanide-selective electrode) or by silver-nitrate titration. Both methods have real uncertainty; both are sensitive to sample preparation.

On a 2,000 tpd operation running typical Canadian ore grade (2.1 g/t Au, 89 % nominal recovery), a 3.8 % recovery loss is 0.57 kg Au per day, or about $140k USD per month at spot. That number gets the attention of operations managers but rarely the instrumentation budget — which is where it came from.

Why Canadian operations see this worse than most

Ontario and Quebec gold operations share three characteristics that make the measurement harder:

The measurement architecture that handles it

Standard process pH probes in CIL service last about 3 weeks before recovery falls noticeably. Good ones last 6 months. The differences are architectural:

FeatureStandard (3 weeks)CIL-grade (6 months)
Glass membraneGeneral-purpose high-pHSlurry-specific alkaline-resistant
Reference junctionCeramic pin (clogs)PTFE annular or open sleeve
Reference fillingGel (static)Liquid with 0.2–0.5 mL/day outflow
Electrode bodyPolysulfone or PVDFHDPE or PEEK, shock-resistant to ore impact
Temperature comp.NTC thermistor in probe tipDual thermistor (probe + body)
Cleaning strategyManual weeklyUltrasonic auto-clean on schedule

The CIL-grade probe costs 3–4× the standard. It lasts 8× longer and measures accurately the whole time. The cost per reliable data day is lower by a factor of two, and that calculation does not include the recovery value of accurate pH control.

Free-CN⁻ measurement: ISE vs titration vs online photometric

For daily production records and CIL control, three options exist:

ISE (cyanide-selective electrode)

Fast response (seconds), online-capable, low cost. Interferes with dissolved iron, copper, and free sulphide. Works well in 'clean' operations (silicate host rock, low Fe) — poorly in sulfide-ore operations without sample conditioning. Required sample prep: NaOH addition to fix pH at 12+, lead nitrate to precipitate sulphide, air purge to strip HCN.

Silver-nitrate titration (AgNO₃)

Classical reference method. Manual, slow (10–15 min per sample), but low interference when sample is prepared. Canadian operations typically run 4–6 titrations per shift as a check on online ISE. The titration remains the defensible audit record; the ISE is the operational feedback signal.

Online photometric

Colorimetric methods (pyridine-barbituric acid, CN-selective reagents) read out in real time via flow-through cell. Higher capital cost; less interference than ISE. Appropriate for operations above 5,000 tpd where the recovery value justifies the instrumentation. Becoming more common in Canadian operations above 4 g/t grade.

The control strategy that keeps you in the window

Three-loop control, from slowest to fastest:

  1. Lime addition (pH) — slow loop, 5-min deadband. Use the tank-average pH, not the probe nearest the lime inlet. Short-cycle dosing fails because lime takes minutes to fully dissolve and mix.
  2. CN addition — medium loop, hourly adjustment. Feed-forward on ore tonnage and feed grade; feedback from online ISE or shift titration. The ISE is the controller input when sample conditioning is working; the titration is the sanity check.
  3. Air/oxygen sparge — fast loop, continuous. DO setpoint typically 6–8 mg/L. Above 10 mg/L is wasted reagent; below 4 mg/L starves the reaction. DO probe must be membraned (polarographic or luminescent), not galvanic, for lifetime.

Summary